One of Bangladesh's best Test results

For a side that has lost an overwhelming majority of their Tests, a draw – whether on a featherbed or not – is a result to savour

Mohammad Isam in Galle12-Mar-2013How an uninteresting day of Test match cricket can essentially be a blessing was witnessed in Galle. Boring was good, nay great, for Bangladesh.An interesting end to this game would have meant Bangladesh wickets falling quickly in the final sessions, and that was not going to be appropriate for a team that had posted a 600-plus score in the first innings. It was contested on a wicket that smothered any contest, but it is not the first time Bangladesh played on a featherbed. On 24 previous occasions a team has scored more than 500 against them and won handsomely.In the context of a side that has lost 65 out of 76 Test matches, a draw has to be a positive result, though it is not too popular an idea for many. But this was exactly the sort of Test match that this team has worked on for years, especially the last five when they have shown steady improvement under Mushfiqur Rahim and Shakib Al Hasan.This was Bangladesh’s eighth drawn Test match and only the second one in which playing time was not lost. The only other occasion was against Zimbabwe at home in 2005. Indeed against a major Test side, this was the first time they had drawn a game. Besides Bangladesh’s Test wins against a young Zimbabwe in 2005 and a third-string West Indies in 2009, this is their best result in Test cricket given the opposition, the track record against the opposition and the very fact that Bangladesh had never taken the game into the fifth day in eight previous Tests in Sri Lanka. And not to forget, Bangladesh were understrength due to the absence of two of their major players.Sri Lanka led by 48 runs on the fifth day, and as Kumar Sangakkara and Tillakaratne Dilshan picked up centuries, the Bangladesh fielders were visibly struggling. There were dives over the ball, several fumbles and offspinner Sohag Gazi had to rest due to leg cramps, and could bowling only 15 overs.Mushfiqur was wary of what had happened on the fifth day against West Indies just three months ago. They had to chase 245 in more than two sessions but froze when it mattered – the bouncers were not handled properly and it ended up as a 77-run loss despite Bangladesh making their then highest Test score.In preparation for this fifth day, the captain held two meetings with all the players, first after the end of the fourth day’s play and then during warm-up on the fifth morning. The message was simple: “work harder on the fifth day, more than the first four days”.He emphasised the importance of not giving up, despite the physical struggle in the heat. This time, the goal was to just hold on till the end but there were hiccups with the bat too. The wicket of Anamul Haque highlighted the young opener’s struggle against the swinging ball and perhaps more work on his technique is due. Jahurul Islam and Mohammad Ashraful, on whom all the focus was on after he had made 190, just about held on.Mushfiqur later said the experience of the Dhaka Test last November played a part in their approach to the fifth day. They did not cower under the pressure of expectations, neither did they play their best cricket. They survived for five hours, and that’s what they often fail to do.Test cricket was certainly not been the winner in this game, but the competition provided by the underdogs provided some joy. Sri Lanka played it safe in the first session, probably not taking the risk of letting Bangladesh have a crack at a small total or a slower asking run-rate. This chunk of respect is what Mushfiqur and the rest of the Bangladesh team should strive to gain in every Test match. It cannot always be about winning, that’s what this Test match has explained to Bangladesh.

Rah rah England

Andy Zaltzman watches the Perth Test with eyes wide shut

Andy Zaltzman25-Feb-2013Mitchell Johnson looks on in stoical horror as a mythical unnameable evil flying beast bears down on him, thereby brightening England’s prospects in Melbourne•Getty ImagesDay 1
England rampaged to within a millimetre of Ashes victory today, obliterating the Australians for a paltry 268 and then blasting their magnificent, golden-tinged way to an imposing 29 for 0 at close of play. If the Australian cricket team were the Labrador they have always dreamed of being, they would have been taken to a vet and humanely destroyed.As England progress serenely to their inevitable triumph, there is an unusual feeling amongst England fans. This Ashes has been like watching a lion toying with a zebra-print balloon. Yes, you can still admire the majesty of the great beast, but it would be more interesting to see him decimate a worthier foe than the zebralloon.Their imminent crushing victory will be so conclusive, routine and majestic as to become rather boring, and not a little awkwardly embarrassing. And the dark, dark Ashes years of 1989-2003 and 2006-07 are receding into the murky swamp of history, as if being tugged underneath by an unusually peckish shark.Day 2
Morning session: A characteristically brilliant start by Cook and Strauss, surely now England’s greatest-ever pair of men, has put England in total, unremitting command of this game. Australia’s bowlers seem more likely to find the Pope hiding in Ricky Ponting’s kitbag than they do to take a wicket. In fact, it is all so one-sided, predictable and uninteresting that I think I’ll pop off for a quick snooze. I’ll just think of Geoff Marsh batting, that should do the zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.Afternoon session: Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzz zzzzzzzzzzz. Zzzz zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.Evening session: That was a good snooze. Hilfenhaus still has not taken a wicket since the first over of the series. Would you believe that? Phil Hughes looks all over the place. Ricky Ponting couldn’t hit an egg in a chicken enclosure at the moment. Finn should pitch it up a bit more. I can’t believe India played so poorly in South Africa – are these supposedly top-class batsman completely devoid of skill against the moving ball? England must be at least No. 2 in the world rankings now.Day 3
I wonder what happens if you try to eat a sandwich whilst having a shower?Day 4
It’s nearly Christmas. Yippee. Sounds like Ricky Ponting will have to play on with a broken finger. Ouch. Nothing is going right for him this series.I’m taking the family to Rome tomorrow. I wonder if we’ll be able to catch the end of day five at the airport on the way out? Let’s hope so.

Gayle and Malinga take top honours

Brendon McCullum’s unbeaten 158 in the IPL opener in 2008 continues to be the best batting performance, while Anil Kumble’s 5 for 5 is the top bowling display

S Rajesh02-Apr-2013The IPL is now five seasons old, over which period 4931 innings have been played in 323 matches, but the best batting performance in these five seasons remains the one that was played by an opener in the first innings of the very first match of the competition. Brendon McCullum’s unbeaten 158 off 73 balls for Kolkata Knight Riders, when he creamed 13 sixes off the hapless Royal Challengers Bangalore attack, remains at the top of the pile of best innings with 81.10 points, well clear of Sanath Jayasuriya’s 114 off 48 in the same season for Mumbai Indians against Chennai Super Kings.The top three innings are all hundreds, but the fourth one is a bit of a surprise: Harbhajan Singh’s unbeaten 49 off 18 is fourth, but one look at the match scorecard and the context of his runs explains his high position: Harbhajan came in to bat at 119 for 7 in the 17th over, and blasted 49 to lift his team to 172; in reply, Deccan Chargers were bowled out for 131.Virender Sehwag is the only player to feature three times in the top 15 – in third, eighth and 15th spots. Adam Gilchrist takes the fifth and sixth spots for innings of 85 (off 35) and 109 (off 47). Both these knocks were in identical chases, but the century came in an easier chase, when Gilchrist and VVS Laxman combined in an unbeaten first-wicket partnership of 155 against Mumbai Indians; his 85 came in a chase of 154, against Delhi Daredevils, but this time Chargers lost four wickets, and the second-highest score was only 24. Yusuf Pathan and Chris Gayle are the others to feature more than once.

Best IPL batting performances

BatsmanInningsStrike rateForAgainstSeasonPointsBrendon McCullum158 off 73216.44KKRRCB200881.10Sanath Jayasuriya114 off 48237.50MICSK200872.41Virender Sehwag119 off 56212.50DDDC201166.29Harbhajan Singh49 off 18272.22MIDC201065.47Adam Gilchrist85 off 35242.86DCDD200965.38Adam Gilchrist109 off 47231.91DCMI200865.23Yusuf Pathan100 off 37270.27RRMI201064.55Virender Sehwag94 off 41229.27DDDC200864.47Chris Gayle128 off 62206.45RCBDD201263.07Suresh Raina98 off 55178.18CSKRR200962.73Yusuf Pathan62 off 30206.67RRDD200962.50MS Dhoni70 off 40175.00CSKRCB201162.08Chris Gayle107 off 49218.37RCBKXI201160.95Rohit Sharma109 off 60181.67MIKKR201260.49Virender Sehwag75 off 34220.59DDRR201060.00The two best batting performances are from the 2008 season, and the two best bowling ones are from 2009. Anil Kumble leads the way, for his 5 for 5 against Rajasthan Royals in Cape Town in 2009. Amit Singh comes in in second place for his spell of 3 for 9 in a relatively high-scoring match against Kings XI Punjab in which 344 runs were scored in 40 overs. That’s followed by Sohail Tanvir’s 6 for 14 against Chennai Super Kings.Because of a significant amount of weightage being given to the economy rates, some of the best performances in the table below are those in which bowlers have taken two or three wickets, but at very good economy rates. Rahul Sharma’s 2 for 7 off four overs, for instance, came in a match against Mumbai Indians in which 299 runs were scored in 40 overs, and no other bowler went at less than five runs per over. Similarly, Lasith Malinga (3 for 9 versus Deccan Chargers) and Dale Steyn (3 for 8 against Royal Challengers make it to the top ten because of their economy rates as well.

Best IPL bowling performances

BowlerSpellEcon rateForAgainstSeasonPointsAnil Kumble5 for 51.57RCBRR200971.80Amit Singh3 for 92.25RRKXIP200970.54Sohail Tanvir6 for 143.50RRCSK200870.15Rahul Sharma2 for 71.75PWMI201167.99Amit Mishra4 for 92.25DCKXIP201167.86Ajit Chandila4 for 133.25RRPW201266.96Lasith Malinga3 for 92.25MIDC201166.02Ishant Sharma5 for 124.00DCKTK201164.79Dale Steyn3 for 82.00DCRCB201263.56Amit Mishra5 for 174.25DDDC200863.33Munaf Patel5 for 215.25MIKXIP201163.20Sohail Tanvir3 for 102.50RRRCB200862.44Ravindra Jadeja5 for 164.00CSKDC201262.09Harbhajan Singh4 for 174.25MIDD200961.85Shoaib Akhtar4 for 113.66KKRDD200861.30In terms of overall numbers, there’s no doubt regarding the best batsman in all IPL seasons put together. Six batsmen have scored more runs than Gayle, but none as been as consistently destructive as Gayle: over 42 innings, he averages 50.11 at a strike rate of almost 162. He is also the only batsman to score three hundreds, and was Player of the Tournament in 2011. Gayle’s 12 Man-of-the-Match awards are the joint-highest in all IPL matches – he shares the record with Yusuf Pathan.Averaging out the rating points for all batsmen, Gayle’s average score of 24.30 is about 20% better than the next-best, Shaun Marsh’s 20.11. Marsh is one of three Australians who occupy the slots immediately after the top position, while Indian batsmen dominate the rest of the top ten, with five of them in the next six. Sehwag is marginally ahead of Sachin Tendulkar, while Suresh Raina and MS Dhoni round off the top ten.

Top batsmen overall in IPL

BatsmanMatchesRunsAverageStrike ratePointsChris Gayle43180450.11161.7924.30Shaun Marsh42160345.80135.9620.11Shane Watson39124240.06146.8018.75Matthew Hayden32110736.90137.5118.55Virender Sehwag66187930.30167.3116.24Sachin Tendulkar64204737.90119.2115.90Michael Hussey2995839.91120.6515.86Gautam Gambhir72206533.30128.9015.52Suresh Raina81225433.64139.3915.41MS Dhoni78178237.12136.4414.82Not only is Malinga the leading wicket-taker in IPL, he also has the best average points (calculated by averaging out his points for every IPL bowling performance). Malinga is a couple of points clear of Muttiah Muralitharan, who is in second place. The rest of the top ten is bunched together very closely, with less than three points separating the second-ranked Muralitharan from the tenth-ranked Ashish Nehra.

Top bowlers overall in IPL

BowlerMatchesWicketsAverageEconomy ratePointsLasith Malinga568316.636.3625.44Muttiah Muralitharan555724.476.4823.50Dale Steyn525922.106.5823.49Amit Mishra597420.677.1023.08Anil Kumble424523.516.5722.97Morne Morkel313823.267.3622.23R Ashwin494922.956.2222.05Munaf Patel577021.487.3721.51Ryan Harris344422.157.6921.45Ashish Nehra444824.837.5520.93Salient points about the performance analysis methodology Each batting and bowling performance by every player in the IPL gets a score, based on the runs scored and the strike rate, or the wickets taken and the economy rate. The batting position is factored in, since it’s easier for a top-order batsman to score more runs in a limited-overs format. The batting strike rate is weighed against the scoring rate in the match. Thus, runs scored in a high-scoring match counts for less than the same runs scored in a low-scoring game. A similar logic holds for the economy rates for bowlers. However, extra points are given for runs made when batting second in a high run-chase. For bowlers, top-order wickets count for more than tail-end wickets. Bowlers who bowl their full quota of four overs get full value for their performance, compared to those who bowl only a fraction of their four-over quota.

Spin, top-order batting make the difference

In the strongest test of their ability to play spin, Australia’s inexperienced top-order batsmen were found wanting in alien conditions

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan25-Mar-2013When Australia toured India in 2001, they were a world-beating team on a 15-match winning streak. In that series, India’s fortunes were completely turned around by a fantastic partnership between VVS Laxman and Rahul Dravid in Kolkata. In sharp contrast, the team that toured this time round was inexperienced and lacked quality. Still, halfway through the first Test in Chennai, they were extremely competitive and raised visions of a win until MS Dhoni altered the course of the game with a brilliant double-century. This effort virtually ended the visitors’ challenge. Australia were crushed by an innings in the next Test and beaten convincingly in the third and fourth Tests too. This was the first time that Australia had been whitewashed in a series (three or more matches) since 1982-83 when Pakistan beat them 3-0. The whitewash was also the first achieved by India since their 3-0 home series win against Sri Lanka in 1994. India, who lost 4-0 in England and Australia, joined Australia, West Indies, South Africa and England on the list of teams who have been on the winning and losing side of series whitewashes (four-plus match series).In 2011-12, India travelled to Australia after a 4-0 drubbing in England. The first Test at the MCG proved close until the end of day four, before India fell away, losing by 122 runs. The next three Tests were forgettable for India as Australia won two by an innings and one by 298 runs. India’s batting average in the series was just 23.08 as compared to Australia’s 51.56. In the recent series in India, the stats were completely reversed. Australia’s batting woes against spin were thoroughly exposed as the visitors managed to average just 25.89. India, in comparison, averaged 43.80. The home dominance of the two teams can be further gauged by comparing the number of centuries scored. While India managed just one century (and 10 fifties) on the 2011-12 tour, Australia were able to score just one century (and 12 fifties) in the recently-concluded series. Australia had six century stands in the home series and three in India. Remarkably, India had the exact same number of partnerships in the home and away series (six and three respectively). As expected, the pace bowlers were the key to Australia’s success in the home series, picking up 71 of the 79 wickets to fall. In India, however, the home spinners were responsible for picking up majority of the wickets (65 out of 78).

Comparison between the two whitewashes in Australia and India
Series Avg(Aus/Ind) Avgdiff (Aus) 100/50 (Aus) 100/50 (Ind) 5WI(Aus/Ind) 100 stands (Aus/Ind) (Pace/spin wkts) Aus (Pace/spin wkts Ind)
India in Australia, 2011-12 51.56/23.08 28.48 6/6 1/10 3/1 6/3 71/8 35/10
Australia in India, 2012-13 25.89/43.80 -17.91 1/12 6/5 3/5 3/6 22/27 13/65

Perhaps the biggest difference between the two teams in the end was the ability of the Indian batsmen to stitch together crucial, match-winning partnerships. In the first Test in Chennai, India were eight down with a lead of just 26 runs, before Dhoni and Bhuvaneshwar Kumar combined to take the game away from Australia with a century stand for the ninth wicket. The second Test in Hyderabad was all about the massive 370-run second-wicket stand between M Vijay and Cheteshwar Pujara. Shikhar Dhawan’s superb debut century set up India’s first innings in Mohali, as he and Vijay were involved in a 289-run opening stand which deflated the Australian attack. In contrast, the Australian top order batsmen struggled to post effective partnerships, and were more often than not rescued by late-order efforts.With both David Warner and Ed Cowan ending with a below-par series performance, Australia’s average for the first wicket was just 40.50. India, on the other hand, put up a much better show (average 71.71) primarily because of the successful run of Vijay, who ended as the highest run-getter in the series. Pujara’s top form also meant that India were well ahead in terms of the average second-wicket partnership. While the average fourth-wicket stand for both teams was not very high, India ended with a far better average for the fifth-wicket partnership. The lower-order partnerships (8-10) were extremely productive for Australia – the last three wickets aggregated 639 runs with six fifty-plus partnerships.

Partnership stats for the two teams
Partnership wicket Australia (Runs/avg) India (Runs/avg) Australia (100/50 stands) India (100/50 stands)
1 324/40.50 502/71.71 1/2 2/0
2 148/18.50 532/76.00 0/1 2/0
3 204/25.50 276/46.00 0/1 0/2
4 180/22.50 161/26.83 0/0 0/1
5 270/33.75 253/63.25 1/0 1/1
6 227/28.37 106/26.50 1/0 0/0
7 54/6.75 56/14.00 0/0 0/0
8-10 639/27.78 304/25.33 0/6 1/1

Australia’s top-order (1-7) batsmen ended the series with an average of 27.40. This is their sixth-lowest average in a series of four or matches since 1970. India’s openers scored 806 runs at an average of 62 with three centuries. In contrast, Australia’s openers managed just 438 runs at an average of 27.37 without a single century. Hughes and Watson had a very ordinary run, compounding Australia’s woes at No. 3. For India, Pujara stood up both at No. 3 (first three Tests) and as an opener in the final Test when he scored twin half-centuries. Tendulkar managed just one half-century and averaged 32 at No. 4. Even so, his performance was significantly better than Australia’s No. 4 batsmen, who managed just 90 runs at 11.25. Clarke’s consistency at No.5 was one of the few highs for Australia in an otherwise forgettable series. Dhoni ensured that the No. 6 stats were dominated completely by the hosts. Although Australia dominated the lower-order (8-11) numbers, they were left rueing the lack of consistency among the top-order batsmen.

Performance of top and lower order of both teams
Batting position India (Runs/avg) India (100/50) Australia (Runs/avg) Australia (100/50)
1-2 806/62.00 3/3 438/27.37 0/3
3 333/55.50 1/0 186/23.25 0/1
4 192/32.00 0/1 90/11.25 0/0
5 234/58.50 1/1 429/53.62 1/2
6 316/79.00 1/0 151/18.87 0/1
7 77/19.25 0/0 213/30.42 0/2
8 20/5.00 0/0 31/3.87 0/0
9 43/14.33 0/0 247/30.87 0/3
10-11 55/9.16 0/0 160/20.00 0/0

Before the series started, it was evident that Australia’s fortunes firmly rested on their ability to play spin. England, who toured India recently, struggled to come to grips in the first Test, but picked up their game in the next three Tests to win the series 2-1. However, Australia had very little experience to fall back on. Only Clarke and Steven Smith (in the last two Tests) demonstrated the necessary footwork and consistency against spin. Phil Hughes was all at sea in the first two Tests, before turning it around in Mohali and Delhi. The Australian right-hand batsmen fared quite well against right-arm spinners (average 30.25) and managed to score at a decent clip (2.81). Against left-arm spin, however (Ravindra Jadeja in particular), the right-hand batsmen struggled, averaging just 19.65 (scoring rate 2.11). The stats are very similar for left-hand batsmen against right-arm spinners; the right-arm spinners picked up 22 wickets at an average of 19.36. Left-hand batsmen fared slightly better against left-arm spinners averaging 24.00 and scoring at a run-rate of 2.80.

Indian spinners against right and left-hand batsmen
Bowler type Batsman type Wickets Average Econ rate Boundary %
Right-arm spin Right-hand bat 12 30.25 2.81 44.62
Left-arm spin Right-hand bat 20 19.65 2.11 50.38
Right-arm spin Left-hand bat 22 19.36 2.14 52.58
Left-arm spin Left-hand bat 11 24.00 2.80 37.12

One of the highlights of the series was Jadeja’s success against Clarke, one of Australia’s best players of spin. Jadeja dismissed Clarke five times in six innings, while conceding just 72 runs (average 14.40). Jadeja also had a great run against Glenn Maxwell, dismissing the aggressive batsman three times (average 3.33). R Ashwin, who ended as the highest wicket-taker in the series, continued his good show against left-handers, dismissing Hughes and Cowan on five and four occasions respectively. While Cowan managed an average of 21.00 (56.75 balls per dismissal), Hughes had a terrible time averaging just 7.80 (35.80 balls per dismissal).Nathan Lyon, who finished with nine wickets in the final Test, dismissed Sachin Tendulkar and Virat Kohli three times each, including getting the two batsmen lbw in both innings of the final match. Lyon however struggled against Dhoni, who hit him for 127 runs off 109 balls (run-rate 6.99) without being dismissed even once. Clarke tasted success against Ashwin, scoring 74 runs (scoring rate 4.18), while being dismissed only once.

Batsman v Bowler in the series
Batsman Bowler Runs Dismissals Average Balls per dismissal Scoring rate
Michael Clarke Ravindra Jadeja 72 5 14.40 38.00 2.27
Phil Hughes R Ashwin 39 5 7.80 35.80 1.30
Ed Cowan R Ashwin 84 4 21.00 56.75 2.22
Glenn Maxwell Ravindra Jadeja 10 3 3.33 12.66 1.57
Sachin Tendulkar Nathan Lyon 76 3 25.33 35.66 4.26
Virat Kohli Nathan Lyon 75 3 25.00 41.33 3.62
Michael Clarke R Ashwin 74 1 74.00 106.00 4.18
MS Dhoni Nathan Lyon 127 0 6.99

The bat that died for Ireland

How the players involved a dismissal in a match played 123 years ago in Dublin found themselves figuring in the fight for Irish independence

Liam Herringshaw03-Sep-2013″Serious sport,” George Orwell once wrote, “has nothing to do with fair play. It is war minus the shooting.”In cricket history, this has been proved true a few times. However, a remarkable object in the National Museum of Ireland collection shows that, occasionally, Orwell’s claim actually isn’t bold enough: a crafted piece of willow with a .303 calibre bullet lodged in its midriff, known with some affection as The Cricket Bat That Died For Ireland.If symbolic of Anglo-Irish relations at the turn of the 20th century*, the shot bat also helps reveal the strange, sad role that Ireland’s cricketers played in the country’s struggles for self-government.The most extraordinary tale comes from an 1890 match between the national team and the nomadic amateur club I Zingari. To claim that one dismissal could encapsulate the story of Irish independence sounds ridiculous. However, it does, and it happened 123 years ago this week, at Phoenix Park, Dublin, when Prince Christian Victor was caught by Frank Browning off the bowling of George Berkeley.The dismissal itself was fairly unremarkable: a catch at the wicket off a left-arm bowler. The reasons that make it so significant are the three young protagonists and the way their lives entwined again with tragic consequences more than two decades later.The 23-year-old batsman, Prince Christian Victor, was an officer of the King’s Royal Rifle Corps, having joined the army after leaving school. He would go on to serve under Lord Kitchener in Sudan and then fight in the Second Boer War in South Africa, where, in Pretoria in 1900, he contracted malaria and died, aged 33.As a consequence, his direct role in the eventual independence of Ireland was minimal, but it was his status that matters to the story. For Prince Christian Victor – or, more properly, Prince Victor Albert Ludwig Ernest Anton Christian of Schleswig-Holstein (his family called him “Christle”) – was the Windsor Castle-born grandson of Queen Victoria, and “a great favourite” of hers.As a royal soldier, he could barely have been more redolent of the British establishment. For good measure, though, he was also the only member of the British Royal Family ever to play first-class cricket, at Scarborough in 1887, three years before the I Zingari match.The bowler – George Fitz-Hardinge Berkeley, an Oxford scholar aged just 20 – wasn’t quite of such high birth, though he also went on to become a British officer in the Boer War. Berkeley was nonetheless an Irishman, a major’s son from Dublin, and became strongly supportive of Home Rule, the move to devolve at least some British parliamentary powers to a government based in Ireland.On the cricket field, Berkeley was a very fine left-arm medium-pacer, taking 131 wickets in 32 first-class games, including 8 for 70 on debut for Oxford University against the Australians in 1890. In the portentous Phoenix Park match later that year, he claimed figures of 11 for 75, yet it was one of only two games he would play for his native country.The pivotal figure in this story, though, is the 22 year-old wicketkeeper, Frank “Chicken” Browning. Quite why he was nicknamed thus is unclear, for if there was one thing he wasn’t, it was cowardly. Born in Dun Laoghaire in 1868, Browning went to Marlborough College and then Dublin University, playing cricket for both institutions. He made his Ireland debut in 1888 against Scotland, and represented his country for the next 21 years.Browning was captain 13 times, including for a 1907 game against the South Africans, a 1908 match versus Yorkshire, and – coming full circle – a clash with Scotland in 1909.A reliable batsman as well as gloveman, Browning made a fine 50 against WG Grace’s South of England XI in June 1890, and 40 and 31 in a famous victory over the South Africans in 1904. He fared less well in the I Zingari game, scoring 19 and 6. However, he did manage to stump Prince Christian Victor in the first innings, when Berkeley took 7 for 20, before combining with Berkeley to claim the Prince’s scalp in the second too. Ireland won by three wickets.At the time of that match, Home Rule in Ireland was the dominant issue of Anglo-Irish politics. In 1886, a first bill had been presented to the House of Commons, which rejected the motion. A second proposal, in 1893, was passed by the Commons but then vetoed by the House of Lords. Nationalists began to suspect that Home Rule would never be forthcoming, while Unionists, particularly in Ulster, feared it was on its way. Tensions were always close to the surface.A view of Sackville Street and the River Liffey in the aftermath of the Easter Rising in Dublin•PA PhotosBoth Browning and Berkeley became barristers, the former in Dublin, the latter in London. Still keen to promote the cause, Berkeley joined the council of the London Committee of Irish Volunteers, with another Irish veteran of the Boer War, Erskine Childers. Together with Nationalist Party leader John Redmond they supported Home Rule, but Berkeley did not believe that physical force should be used to achieve it, nor that Ireland should become a republic.In 1914, with members of Prince Christian Victor’s extended family taking the world to war, matters came to a head.At the outbreak of hostilities, Browning, now president of the Irish Rugby Football Union, helped establish the IRF Corps. Those young enough for active service were sent to Gallipoli, while the older members – including Browning – stayed behind as a Home Guard. Thanks to their age and the fact their guns had the king’s name in Latin emblazoned upon them, the men became known as the Gorgeous Wrecks.If avoiding the unspeakable horrors of the eastern Mediterranean might have seemed a good thing, though, events were soon to bring carnage to the streets of Dublin.Fearful of civil unrest, the British government had banned the importation of weapons into Ireland early in 1914, but more than 20,000 guns were smuggled from Germany into Ulster shortly afterwards to arm the Unionist volunteers. Concerned by this, Berkeley and supporters funded the purchase of 1000 German rifles, which were shipped into Howth, just north of Dublin, to ensure the Irish Volunteers could defend themselves.Regardless of Berkeley’s exact take, the push for independence gathered momentum. In the spring of 1916, having appealed to Germany for direct support, the Irish Volunteer Force united with the Irish Citizen Army, led by James Connolly, to form a republican militia. They planned an Easter insurrection, and the Germans sent a huge shipment of captured Russian arms to assist in its success.The weapons were intercepted by the British Navy on April 21, but despite this, the leadership pressed on with the plans. On Easter Monday, April 24, 1916, taking command of various key buildings across central Dublin, Connolly and the republican leadership issued a proclamation of Irish independence. The Easter Rising had begun.That weekend, Browning and the Gorgeous Wrecks had been on a weekend practice drill outside Dublin. On Easter Monday, they paraded their way back to the Beggars Bush barracks close to the Lansdowne Road rugby stadium, oblivious to what had unfolded.Near the Mount Street Bridge across the Grand Canal, republican soldiers – led by James Grace and Lieutenant Michael Malone – were holed up in a series of houses overlooking this strategic junction. They had taken position to guard the area; to prevent any British soldiers entering the heart of the city.As Browning’s men approached, Malone and Grace presumed them to be the British Army and began shooting at them. Having only been on a practice drill, the Gorgeous Wrecks had no loaded weapons. Taken completely by surprise, they could not return fire. In panic, they ran towards the barracks, but many did not make it. By the time the rebels understood the reality of the situation and stopped firing, four of the IRF Corps had been mortally wounded.The road was strewn with bodies, and startled locals dashed out to help. It was too late for Browning, though. He was taken to Beggars Bush and died there two days later, the only first-class cricketer to be killed in the Rising: shot by a German rifle, but far from the Western Front.As if in parallel, while Browning lay dying, the cricket bat was added to the Rising’s victims. On display in the window of JW Elvery & Co, Sackville Street, where the fighting was fiercest, it was hit on the 25th or 26th of April. Ironically, the bullet calibre shows it was fired by the British.The front page of the carries the news of the Easter Rising, April 26, 1916•Getty ImagesSo, more than a quarter of a century after the catch, the wicketkeeper was killed by a gun the bowler bought to help liberate their country from the rule of the batsman’s family. Berkeley was said to be “horrified” by events, but a man who purchased the armaments could hardly absolve himself of all responsibility for how they were used.Across Dublin, the Rising saw 64 rebels, 116 soldiers and 254 civilians killed, but the republicans were vastly outnumbered by the British army, and after six days, the authorities eventually reclaimed control.If the uprising had been shocking to most Dubliners, many of whom disapproved of the tactics, the British response was perhaps more so. With Dublin under military rule, most of the leaders were swiftly executed, inadvertently helping to cement public support for the Irish cause.The 1918 UK elections saw a swathe of republican MPs elected to the British parliament, a second declaration of independence, and a full-blown war. Finally, in 1922, Ireland became a republic.Almost nine decades on, despite many ups and downs, stability has prevailed. The political response to Ireland’s successes at the 2007 World Cup (the photo shows unionist Ian Paisley and republican Martin McGuinness celebrating) showed that cricket can be a power to unite the country rather than divide.As will be apparent on Tuesday, though, having your own sovereignty is one thing, sporting independence quite another. Ireland host England in Dublin with one of their own as opposition captain, and another as a recent acquisition. On the cricket field at least, the march of Irish progress still has some way to go.Whatever happens, though, hopefully there will never be another moment with quite such fateful repercussions as that dismissal at Phoenix Park in August 1890.*Sports scholar Sean Reid argues that, contrary to perception, cricket was not seen as “English” and that it was actually very popular in Ireland in the 19th century. In the 1860s and ’70s, he suggests, only in England and Australia was the game played more widely and to a higher standard.

Du Plessis' latest spin tangle

Plays of the Day from the first Twenty20 international between Sri Lanka and South Africa in Colombo

Andrew Fidel Fernando in Colombo02-Aug-2013The poor shot
Faf du Plessis has perhaps been the worst of South Africa’s batsmen this tour, and his latest dismissal served to illustrate how clueless he has been against spin in Sri Lanka. As Sachithra Senanayake arrived at his delivery stride, du Plessis began to shuffle to the off side, seemingly intent to hit the ball to leg. Just as Senanayake bowled, though, he had a change of heart. Quickly he attempted to reassume his normal stance and stepped back, prodding at the ball, now hoping to do no more than defend it down the pitch. All that moving around had put him off, though, and by the time du Plessis offered a shot, Senanayake’s straighter one had slipped past him and hit off stump.The adamant appeal
With Kumar Sangakkara showing signs of the same sublime touch with which he tormented South Africa in the ODIs, the visitors’ desperation to see his back spilled over into an animated appeal, with the batsman on 24. David Wiese bowled an offcutter for his first ball in international cricket, and seeing some width, Sangakkara went back to cut it. He couldn’t connect as he wished, though, with the ball going close to his top edge, perhaps even grazing it. Behind the stumps, Quinton de Kock began celebrating immediately, with Wiese and the surrounding fielders quickly joining in. They then sported looks of disbelief when the umpire refused to raise his finger, with de Kock even requesting a review with some agitation, forgetting one was not available for this match.The wasted reprieve
AB de Villiers had seen his side fluff chances in the field throughout the ODI series, then watched Sri Lanka’s batsmen flourish in their second life, but when he was finally granted a reprieve in this match, he was unable to make Sri Lanka pay for it. He was dropped by Dinesh Chandimal at midwicket, pulling Angelo Mathews in the 11th over, but next ball, went for an ambitious upper cut of a back-of-a-length delivery, and managed to hit the ball in the air only as far as Kusal Perera, who ran in from the sweeper-cover fence to complete a good take.The double-strike
South Africa had incrementally won over the advantage by the 18th over of Sri Lanka’s innings, but it was Wayne Parnell’s fearless double-wicket maiden in the 19th that effectively secured the match. He began with two angled length balls, which Senanayake failed to squeeze away for a single, before Parnell banged in a bouncer heading for Senanayake’s throat. The next ball was a slower one, which Senanayake lobbed to the keeper, and Lasith Malinga fared no better, missing a back-of-a-length ball before slicing a low full toss to point, to leave Sri Lanka nine down.

De Boorder's bizarre dismissal

Plays of the day for the match between Rajasthan Royals and Otago in Jaipur

Kanishkaa Balachandran01-Oct-2013The bizarre shot
Rahul Shukla needed just one over to prove that his selection for this game was an inspired one. After sending off Hamish Rutherford and Brendon McCullum within the first three balls of his first over, a third wicket was gifted to him. It was a short ball and Derek de Boorder was caught in two minds whether to hook or leave it. The ball came on quicker than expected and the indecisive de Boorder merely showed his bat at the ball. The ball took the top edge and tamely lobbed up to Shukla, who couldn’t believe how easy that wicket was. Otago slipped from 16 for 0 to 20 for 3 in the space of six balls.The howler
James Neesham should have been out on 0. Kevon Cooper knew it. With Otago reeling at 30 for 4, the in-form Neesham drove at a fuller delivery from Cooper and there was very audible sound as the ball passed him. The catch was taken cleanly by the wicketkeeper and Cooper started celebrating, only to look back to see the umpire Paul Reiffel unmoved. Replays showed a thick inside edge. Neesham went on to score a quickfire 32.The embarrassingly bad delivery part II
Shane Watson’s having trouble gripping the ball in this tournament. Two days earlier against Perth Scorchers, the ball slipped out of his hand at his delivery stride and looped to Simon Katich who swished at thin air. It happened again today to Watson, but this time the ball swirled so far from the pitch that it was headed towards point. A warning to unassuming fielders to pay attention when Watson’s bowling.The catch
For a while the Otago fielders could only watch as Ajinkya Rahane gave Royals a rapid start in their chase. Otago knew they needed to create something out of nothing to stop Royals in their tracks and it came via Nathan McCullum’s sharp catching. Rahul Dravid got a thick outside edge to the left-arm spinner Nick Beard and the ball ballooned towards point. McCullum pedalled backwards and realised that the ball was evading him quickly. In a split second he turned around managed to pluck the ball on the flip. It was the inspiration Otago needed.

The Ashes tour of the giant fast bowler

England’s squad looks impressive – especially when it comes to the height of their quick bowlers – but they are gambling on their plans working perfectly and have ignored some compelling domestic form

George Dobell23-Sep-2013The inclusion of Gary Ballance may delight headline writers, but it is the somewhat ironic lack of balance in the Ashes squad that may come back to haunt England.Size is everything in this squad. The inclusion of four tall, strong seamers – Chris Tremlett, Boyd Rankin, Stuart Broad and Steven Finn – underlines the preference of the current England management for bowlers of such characteristics above all other considerations. England are in the age of the giant fast bowler.There is some logic in the policy. On Australian pitches expected to offer more pace and bounce than those seen in the Ashes series in England, such bowlers could prove a handful. The limitations of traditional English seam or swing bowlers can sometimes be exposed on such surfaces.But there is no obvious Plan B available in this England squad. If James Anderson is injured – and the thought of it should be enough to send shivers down the spine of any England supporter – the England seam attack will have the subtly of a sledgehammer. Height, pace and bounce are valuable attributes, but they are not the only attributes and the inclusion of Rankin and Tremlett et al. looks like too much of a good thing.It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the selectors no longer have much regard for performances at county level. If they did, Graham Onions – who has taken 143 first-class wickets at an average of 18.39 in the last two seasons – would have been an automatic selection. Instead they have opted for Tremlett, who has been selected more due to memories of his performances in Australia in 2010-11 than any recent success, and Rankin, who is bowling with menace but has taken one five-wicket haul since May 2011. Onions, by contrast, has taken five this season.It is not hard to understand Onions’ disappointment. Indeed, writing on Twitter, he said “Disappointed is an understatement, absolutely gutted.”Onions has been, without question, the best English-qualified seamer in county cricket over the last couple of years. While it is true that pitches at his home ground in Durham offer more assistance than any England are likely to find in Australia, he has also taken wickets away from home. In Durham’s last two away Championship games, Onions claimed match-figures of 9 for 85 in Derby, which is generally one of the best wickets in the country, and first-innings figures of 7 for 62 at Lord’s. His qualities – accuracy and movement – are timeless, yet it seems they are outdated to the current England management.Being an England fast bowler is a big job these days•Getty ImagesWhile the selectors have ignored Onions’ excellent domestic record, they have also overlooked Michael Carberry’s modest form. Carberry, who has scored one Championship century in two seasons of Division Two cricket, has been preferred to Nick Compton, who has scored six Division One centuries and two more in Test cricket in the same period and is more than two-years younger. Character has, in Carberry’s case, been deemed more important than achievement.None of this means the selectors are wrong. They may well have identified skills that will be useful in Australia and ignored accomplishments that they feel are less relevant. But it is intriguing that the England management seem to have deemed, rightly or wrongly, the Compton experiment – that is the experiment of calling up a player from outside the youth teams or Lions programme on the back of excellent performances in county cricket – a failure. It may well be that they are reluctant to trust county performances again. It is a dangerous road down which to venture.The selection of Ben Stokes ahead of Chris Woakes for the allrounder’s position might be seen in the same way. While Woakes’ first-class record – a batting average of 38.04 and a bowling average of 25.91 – is a little better than Stokes’ – 36.23 and 27.19 respectively – the selectors have again decided that the latter’s extra pace will render him more dangerous at Test level. It is, in general, a reasonable assumption, though it is worth recalling the success of Chaminda Vaas, Vernon Philander and Terry Alderman. You might even question whether Anderson, if he was six or seven years younger, would be considered by this England regime.Ballance’s first-class record is excellent and his selection quite reasonable. He has a career average well in excess of 50 in both List A and first-class cricket and scored back-to-back centuries for England Lions against Australia and Bangladesh A only a month ago. He does not look the fittest but, aged 23, has time to improve that aspect of his game and has to be considered a genuine candidate to bat at No. 6 in the first Test at Brisbane.It is also worth noting that none of the three uncapped players were born in England or Wales. While there is nothing wrong in England utilising all available options and, as result of a variety of historical issues, they have more options than most, it is intriguing that players whose initial development occurred outside England and Wales seem to thrive disproportionately and raises questions about the English system that it would be sensible to reflect upon. To be fair, suggesting that Stokes – born in New Zealand but as much a product of the north-east as Steve Harmison or Paul Collingwood – is anything other than home-grown would be stretching a point.This is a squad that should be good enough to retain the Ashes. Australia are still in the early stages of their rebuilding operation and nine of the England XI for the first Test in Brisbane are likely to have been regular members of the team that won the series in England 3-0.But questions remain about England’s bench strength. Should injury befall either of England two key bowlers – Graeme Swann or Anderson – the gap between the sides will narrow substantially.

Spectators deserve a better pitch

The pitch in Antigua, which will be used for the third time, is doing the spectator few favours but all the players can do is take their chance. Ravi Bopara did that two days ago, winning a game he may not have done in the past

George Dobell in Antigua04-Mar-20140:00

Young guns need to step up for WI and England

Ravi Bopara has not been needed much with the ball so far on surfaces where spin has dominated•Getty ImagesCricket’s governing bodies are a curious bunch. Try to take a soft drink into a game in many places and you can be refused entry; wear a branded top in some places and you face the prospect of being accused of ambush marketing. During the 2007 World Cup, a fellow had his lunch taken from him because the baguette he carried was deemed to be a weapon.But when it comes to the really important thing – the product that is the game of cricket – they, at best, do nothing.Dull pitches represent a greater threat to the future of the game than drugs, spot-fixing, ambush marketing or websites seeking to celebrate and propagate cricket. Dull pitches will result in dull matches that risk losing the interest of spectators and failing to attract the next generation of supporters. And that was, of course, the original point of limited-overs cricket.So it should come as a disappointment to learn that West Indies and England will contest the deciding ODI of their series in Antigua on the same begrudging surface that hosted the first two games. The same surface that yielded just nine fours in West Indies’ innings in the second ODI. The same surface where part-time spinners have proved so effective in stifling the scoring. The same surface where where strokeplay and pace are punished and where patience and accumulation are rewarded. Where anti-cricket thrives. ODI cricket was not meant to be this way.It is no coincidence and should be no surprise that attendances have declined in the Caribbean since such pitches became the norm. This ground has only been filled once. And that was when Kenny Rogers took his love to town.There is, in this case at least, some mitigation. The conditions here are expected to be similar to those in Bangladesh where, in a couple of weeks, these two sides will be starting their World T20 campaign. But it is a shame that spectators have been asked to sit through – and pay for – a training session in desultory cricket.That is not to say that both this sides are not desperate to win. They are like two old heavyweights slugging it out on the undercard; battling not so much for glory as to sustain an ebbing career. They craze confidence and momentum after chastening months and, quite rightly, see each other as opposition ripe for the taking. This has not been a high-quality series.But both sides could be strengthened for this game. Marlon Samuels is not 100% but will be considered for selection by West Indies in the place of the horribly out of sorts Kirk Edwards, while Alex Hales and Eoin Morgan have now trained for three days in succession and are close to a return. Luke Wright looks most vulnerable. In a series typified by weak batting, all three would be welcome.One man who can already take some confidence from this series is Ravi Bopara. His match-winning partnership with Stuart Broad in the second game might not, in the grand scheme of things, be remembered as one of the great innings – he scored 38 in 59 balls, after all – but in the context of his England career, it might prove quietly significant.

Must give Narine more runs – Dwayne Bravo

Dwyane Bravo has appealed to his batsmen to give Sunil Narine a chance to win games for West Indies. In Narine, West Indies believe they have the best spin bowler in the world, but the team’s top-order batting has sometimes asked too much of him.

“Narine is a bowler that most teams struggle to play,” Bravo said. “Not only England. Even India and Sri Lanka. They all struggle.

“He’s a handful, and we’re happy to have him in our squad. But at the same time, we can’t leave it all up to him. It’s a total team effort.

“If we don’t have enough runs, then Narine is no value. We need to have runs on the board to give him the opportunity to deliver for us. We definitely need to bat better. If we can put a better total on the board, we can make a better game of it.

“England bowling spin at the start of our innings caught us by surprise. We were not able to counter-act it, or come up with a gameplan against it.

“We know England are going to do it again. So our batters need to give themselves the opportunity to be themselves, be flamboyant, play fearless and put England under some pressure. We have very good lower-order batting, but it’s the start that has given us the problem.”

As things stand, the defining moment of Bopara’s career is the Champions Trophy final. With England on course for victory – they required 20 to win from 14 balls – Bopara, the last experienced batsman, pulled a long-hop from Ishant Sharma to square-leg. England lost by five runs and their long wait for that first global ODI trophy remains. It is a memory that might bother the whole team for the rest of their lives.It is an uncomfortably accurate summation of Bopara’s career, too, which has to date promised rather more than it has delivered. And certainly the memory of it bothers Bopara.”We came so close in the Champions Trophy,” he said. “We had a chance to win a global competition. That would have been amazing for the team. For all of us, really. Not winning was heartbreaking. It’s right up there with the worst disappointment I’ve had.”When you’re out there, you don’t think back. You don’t think ‘this is what happened in the Champions Trophy’. You just play the situation. You play the ball. But every now and then I’ll be sitting watching TV and I’ll think about the Champions Trophy final and think ‘maybe I could have done this or that’.”He appears to have learned from the experience.”When we needed three to win the other day, Darren Sammy came on as the top bowlers had bowled out,” Bopara said. “He bowled me a short ball and I took the single and got up the other end, looked at square leg and thought ‘You know what, I could easily have hit that straight at him.’ If I’d just pulled it, it would have felt nice coming straight out of the middle of the bat, you think, alright that’s going for four, but it goes straight to the bloke. That could easily have happened again.Such episodes bode well for England. If Bopara, who says he has “never been more hungry” to return to Test cricket, can find the composure to complement his talent, he could yet win many games for England. Perhaps in all formats.”I feel stronger and tougher,” he said. “I don’t question myself as much as I used to. I went through that that period when things weren’t right with my life and I took my eye off the ball. I had a lot of time to think about what I want to do and why I’m here and why I started playing cricket. I realised that the most important thing in my life apart from my family is cricket. Finishing my career saying I’ve played 13 Tests and 100 ODIs; that doesn’t satisfy me.”Winning this ODI series may not satisfy these teams, either. But it will provide something of a foundation stone at the start of a long rebuilding process.

Abdulla's silent redemption

After two poor seasons and repeated axings, Iqbal Abdulla has returned in style for Mumbai

Amol Karhadkar in Mumbai07-Jan-2014Halfway into 2011, Iqbal Abdulla was feeling on top of the world. The left-arm spinner had been picked for the India A tour of England in 2010, and then won the BCCI’s best allrounder award for the 2010-11 Ranji Trophy season, in which he scored nearly 400 runs, including a maiden first-class century, and took 27 wickets.The trajectory of Abdulla’s young career then took an abrupt turn for the worse. A torrid 2011-12 Ranji Trophy campaign, in which he took just 13 wickets in six matches, led to him being dropped from the Mumbai team. He struggled with being labeled a limited-overs specialist, and whispers of Abdulla having been led astray by IPL glitz started doing the rounds.The following season did nothing to help Abdulla’s cause. With Mumbai in a must-win position in their last league game against Madhya Pradesh, Abdulla dropped a regulation catch, which almost led to their exit from the tournament, that too in a televised match. Mumbai left him out of the knockouts and won the Ranji Trophy.All this while Abdulla, who had moved to Mumbai from Azamgarh district in Uttar Pradesh to pursue his passion, remained silent. Even after he was dumped from Mumbai’s squad despite returning match figures of 4 for 83 against Punjab, his only game of the season. Even after Mumbai selector Deepak Jadhav explained 42-year-old Pravin Tambe’s inclusion by saying Abdulla “hasn’t been bowling well”. Abdulla just kept working on his game.When he got his next opportunity, against Gujarat in Valsad, with Mumbai in another must-win situation in another final group match, Abdulla grabbed it. Two crucial thirties and 11 wickets won him Man of the Match and helped Mumbai sneak into the quarterfinals. Then, he opened up.”I always knew my performance would speak for me,” Abdulla said ahead of Mumbai’s quarterfinal against Maharashtra. “A lot of things have been said. There have been manywho criticised me and many who stood by me as well. I don’t think I deserved to be dropped after the Punjab game, but I just kept on doing what I have always done. Thank god the rewards have followed.”When asked if he had analysed the downturn after the high of 2010-11, Abdulla said it wasn’t the result of bad bowling. “It wasn’t as if I was trying too many things,” he said. “It was just that the wickets were so flat that (2011-12) season that no spinner could have an impact. Even Ramesh (Powar), who was the senior spinner, could hardly pick up wickets.”Did focusing on limited-overs cricket make him a defensive bowler? “Many people felt that way,” Abdulla said. “Even Padmakar Shivalkar sir, who was the chief selector then, told me I was dropped because I was bowling too flat. But all I have been doing is backing myself all along. I have always bowled according to conditions and that’s what has worked for me more often than not.”Flighting the ball in helpful conditions in Valsad, Abdulla displayed he had it in him to succeed by bowling classical left-arm spin. If he can continue in the same vein at the Wankhede Stadium over the next five days, he will have done a world of good not just for himself but also for Mumbai’s quest for their 41st title.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus