Bravo fights after record Voges-Marsh stand


Scorecard and ball-by-ball details5:13

Nicholas: Bravo grabbed his opportunity to perform

First, there is Don Bradman and Bill Ponsford. Then comes Adam Voges and Shaun Marsh. Such is the list of all-time Test record partnerships for Australia after Voges and Marsh put on 449 against an insipid West Indies in Hobart. It was the highest fourth-wicket stand in Test history, and the sixth-biggest of the near 70,000 Test partnerships that have ever been compiled. By only two runs did the 451-run Bradman-Ponsford stand against England at The Oval in 1934 survive in first place among Australian partnerships.Those are the facts, but here is the truth: it would have been criminally misleading for Voges and Marsh to have moved into top spot. In terms of size it was Australia’s second-greatest partnership, in terms of quality it was not even close. That is no slight on Voges and Marsh but on the class of the bowling. In Adelaide last month their fourth-innings stand was 400 runs lighter, but arguably more meaningful as they held off the swing of Trent Boult and Doug Bracewell to set up victory.Jerome Taylor, Kemar Roach, Jason Holder – they have all delivered at Test level before. Here they went through the motions. And to paraphrase Dorothy Parker on Katharine Hepburn, it was the gamut of motions from A to B. Amble in with little intent, bowl with no apparent plan, walk back to the mark, repeat. Too many half-volleys, too many on the pads, too many boundary balls. Too many fielders back, too many easy singles. Too many runs, too few efforts to stop them.For most of Australia’s innings this Test had the intensity of a tour game. By stumps little had changed as the West Indies batting order largely collapsed, but at least there was one significant positive for them. Darren Bravo was on the verge of a century. Bravo had moved to 94 and had enjoyed solid support from Kemar Roach, who was on 31, and their partnership had moved along to 91 and was frustrating Steven Smith and his men.West Indies were still 177 runs away from preventing the follow-on, but it was something. They had, after all, been 6 for 116 when Roach joined Bravo. Nathan Lyon spun out the middle order, Josh Hazlewood and Peter Siddle claimed wickets, but Bravo stood firm. More than that, he played with class, and his innings was all the more impressive for the frequent short rain delays that might have affected his focus.He was exquisite through cover and mid-off, 15 of his 17 boundaries coming through the off side, and he looked a class above his batting colleagues, who had all struggled greatly. Bravo had one moment of luck on 78 when he edged Hazlewood between Voges and Smith in the slips, but otherwise his only mistake was in not convincing his partner Holder to ask for a review when Marais Erasmus gave him lbw to a Peter Siddle ball that was sailing well over the bails.That Bravo and Roach had started to show some fight was encouraging for West Indies, for the innings had started miserably. It took Australia four sessions to lose four wickets in their innings; it took West Indies less than one. Hazlewood made the first breakthrough when he had Kraigg Brathwaite trapped lbw for a watchful 2 from 26 deliveries, and then it was all about Lyon.Rajendra Chandrika had struggled against the spin and when he drove at Lyon on 25 he was taken by a juggling Smith at first slip. A better catch came when Marlon Samuels, on 9, drove on the up and Lyon hurled himself into the air to his left and completed a brilliant return take. It was something of a statement from the man who had become the first Australian offspinner to play 50 Tests.Five balls later Lyon had a third, when Jermaine Blackwood played defensively with hard hands and saw his inside edge bob up off his leg to be taken by Joe Burns at bat-pad. Four wickets had arrived before tea and soon after the break, Denesh Ramdin followed when he played back to Hazlewood and failed to get the bat down to a ball that stayed a touch low, and he was bowled for 8. When Holder fell it was 6 for 116, a pitiful reply to Australia’s 4 for 583 declared.It seemed as though nothing could stop Marsh and Voges as they moved Australia’s total along at nearly a run a ball in the first session. Lacklustre as West Indies were, Voges and Marsh still had to concentrate and avoid mistakes, and they did so perfectly. It could also not be forgotten that Australia’s situation had been shaky when they came together on day one.But almost from the first ball of their stand on Thursday, the pressure on them was near non-existent. On Friday, Voges brought up his double-century from his 226th* delivery and in the next over Marsh moved to his 150 from his 227th ball. Both milestones came with singles to deep point; singles were on offer all around the ground all through their partnership.Voges moved to the highest Test score at Bellerive Oval and his 250 came up from 269 deliveries. It was not until the 110th over that West Indies used a review, when Jomel Warrican thought he had found Marsh’s inside edge, but replays revealed the ball had brushed his pad on the way through to Ramdin. Warrican eventually broke the stand when Marsh slog swept to deep midwicket and was out for 182.Voges finished unbeaten on 269 after Smith declared the innings closed during the lunch break. He ended the day with a Test batting average of 76.83, second only to Bradman on Australia’s all-time list of players with a minimum of 10 innings. And as well as Voges had batted, that only highlighted further that this was a day on which statistics told only a small part of the story.* Corrected from 266th delivery (Dec 12, 23:30 GMT)

Simmons hits back at critics

Phil Simmons, Zimbabwe’s coach, dismissed criticism aimed at him following the 3-2 one-day series defeat by Bangladesh and said that the loss was a result of complacency on the part of the players and the technical team.Simmons was lambasted by Richie Kaschula, a member of the national selection panel and a former national player, in the aftermath of the defeat. “Phil must be held responsible for what has been happening in Bangladesh,” Kaschula said. “Phil was left in charge and we, as selectors, are not happy with what has been happening. Phil was in charge of the team and he was doing his own things in selecting the teams that played, ignoring some of the things we told him."But Simmons mounted a spirited defence on his return to Harare. “We played beyond expectations in the first two games and I think when we took the 2-0 lead in the one day series against the hosts the guys were surprised by the results and that led to the guys being excited," he said. “I think I was also excited by the result that the guys had posted and we seemed to have lost direction. Because of that and I believe that is where we got it all wrong.”The batsmen let us down in the third game and that was the major reason we lost but we could have done better. The batsmen failed to reach 240 runs in the last three games."Kaschula had slammed Simmons for his team selections, especially picking the out-of-sorts Dion Ebrahim. “Dion had not performed well in the third game and I thought of dropping him from the team for the fourth game but there is more that I as the coach saw in the young man than just playing on the field," Simmons argued. “I didn’t drop him in the fourth game as he had impressed me during the practise sessions as he showed a lot of confidence in batting and seemed as if he had finally settled and I thought of including him in the team.”

Calculated aggression

When Steve Waugh said Australia would come hard at India, he wasn’t kidding. A team scoring 400 for 5 in a single day was not something the Adelaide Oval had experienced before. Australia went on a run-riot and overtook the 387 they scored against West Indies on the second day of the fourth Test of the Frank Worrell Trophy in 1968-69.A closer look at the scoring pattern lets slip an interesting ploy.

Session Runs Overs Runrate
Morning session 135 27 5
Afternoon session 106 24 4.42
Evening session 159 39 4.08

Australia played to put India on the defensive as soon as the game began, and once the pressure was on, the batsmen could step off the gas, play a relatively safer game, and still end up with a huge total on the first day.

Batsman Strike rates
Langer 80.6
Hayden 80.0
Ponting 71.5
Martyn 76.9
Waugh 56.6
Katich 68.8
Gilchrist 90.0

Ricky Ponting was unbeaten at the day’s end, with a score of 176 in 246 balls with 24 boundaries. His strike rate of 71.5% suggests a poor bowling performance, but on closer inspection, it was Ponting’s frame of mind and the pitch’s true bounce that attributed more to his final score. Ponting had an in-control percentage of 87.4, compared to the team total of 84%. His back-foot strokeplay was authoritative, and the number of runs he scored off the front foot reveals how consistent the bounce was.

Front foot Back foot
Runs scored 99 62
Balls faced 169 60

When Ponting reached his hundred, he achieved the rare distinction of scoring all 16 of his boundaries on the offside. It had a lot to do with the line the Indians bowled.

Percentage of deliveries bowled to Ponting on the offside
Bowler % offside
Agarkar 100
Pathan 88.2
Nehra 91.8
Kumble 82.4

For a large part of the day, India bowled a good length, and just short of a good length. The arrival of Steve Waugh, unsurprisingly, brought a change in tactics. Of the nine bouncers bowled in the day, five were directed at Waugh. Ironically, it took a half-volley – just the delivery the bowlers were trying to avoid – from Ashish Nehra to dismiss him.

Auckland hold on for a draw


An outstanding innings by Tim McIntosh ensured that Auckland came away with an honourable draw at the Eden Park Outer Oval today. And McIntosh added his own touch of honour to the proceedings when he walked, after being caught by Chris Nevin, the Wellington wicketkeeper, after making a splendid 104. McIntosh batted for 329 minutes and hit 13 fours, in an innings that proved crucial to the final outcome. Rob Nicol scored 45 in 160 minutes, but it still required Reece Young and Paul Hitchcock to hold out for more than an hour to secure the draw that saw Auckland move back to the head of the points table. For Wellington, Mathew Walker picked up 3 for 55 in a fine display of controlled medium-pace. Luke Woodcock’s steady 86 in the third day had given Wellington the advantage.A determined batting performance by Northern Districts paid off in the rain-affected match against Otago at Carisbrook in Dunedin. Nick Horsley scored a useful 69, spread over 229 minutes, while Hamish Marshall and Bruce Martin shut up shop and added 97. Marshall, who had a great one-day series in Pakistan, was unbeaten on 65, while Martin chipped in with an undefeated 54. For Otago, Brad Scott was the most impressive bowler on show, and finished with 3 for 50.Palmerston North doesn’t enjoy the greatest reputation with regard to its weather, but Canterbury won’t be complaining after this match – they were better off for the wet weather that disrupted play on the last day. Some defiant batting from Gary Stead (44) and Aaron Redmond (29) kept the Central Districts bowlers at bay, before weather came to the Cantabs’ aid. Regan West, the left-arm spinner, snapped up three victims, but Paul Wiseman and Brendon Donkers defied them until play was called off. The draw left Canterbury in second place on the State Championship table behind Auckland. The next round of matches begin on December 27.

Tempers fray away from the limelight

Fred Titmus: moved south after 28 seasons at Middlesex … but soon returned© The Cricketer

While the cricket world concentrated on the first Test at Lord’s, a few miles to the south, one of domestic cricket’s oldest rivalries was attracting an unforeseen outbreak of handbags at two paces.Middlesex against Surrey does not come close to being in the top flight of sporting rivalries. Often spectators have to pinch themselves to remember that what they are watching is an all-London battle rather than just another county game.Fred Titmus’s move from Lord’s to The Oval at the end of the 1976 season was greeted with a few tuts and general surprise (he redeemed himself by returning home in 1979). But Mark Ramprakash’s defection at the end of 2000 was far more acrimonious, and on his return to Lord’s he was booed to the wicket. The rancour persists. When he reached his fifty at Lord’s earlier this month one member turned to another and asked if Ramprakash had been forgiven. A cry of “bastard” aimed in Ramprakash’s direction from nearby in the pavilion seconds later answered that.After that match – which Surrey lost – Middlesex reported what they viewed as suspicious treatment of the ball by Surrey’s bowlers to the ECB. The authorities ruled that there was no evidence to support the claim, but the ill-feeling was there for all to see when they meet last week at The Oval.Tempers spilt over in public on Friday. Play had been delayed by a combination of heavy overnight rain, a broken water super-sopper, and then in the penultimate over of the day words were exchanged between Jon Batty, Surrey’s captain, and David Nash, the Middlesex wicketkeeper. As the pair squared up, the eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation was ended by the swift intervention of Jeff Evans, the umpire, who zoomed in from square leg.The match ended in a draw, and the ramifications of the standoff will no doubt become clear in due course. But there will be an added element of spice when the two sides meet again in front of around 15,000 at Lord’s in July 15 in the Twenty20 Cup.

Warne will not sue over alleged affair

Shane Warne has drawn stumps on the South African saga© Getty Images

Shane Warne will not take legal action against a South African woman who attempted to extort money from him last year.Helen Cohen Alon was jailed this week for her discredited claim that she was offered R200,000 ($A43,400) by an associate of Warne’s to maintain her silence over a supposed relationship with Warne during Australia’s tour of South Africa in 2002. Cohen Alon, a 47-year-old divorced mother of three, must pay a fine of $A10,800 or she will serve 18 months in prison.But Warne’s brother and manager Jason ruled out any further action. He said: “We closed the book on this quite a while ago now.”

Dyson elated over Sri Lanka's showing

John Dyson: ‘We have learnt from our defeats against Australia’© CricInfo

John Dyson, Sri Lanka’s coach, has praised his team for their growing mental resilience after they turned around a first-innings deficit to complete an emphatic victory in the opening Test against Pakistan at Faisalabad last weekend.Earlier in the year, Sri Lanka had watched in frustration as Australia showed off their legendary mental toughness by overcoming first-innings deficits in three consecutive Tests to complete a series whitewash, the first by any team in Sri Lanka.Dyson sensed that those defeats had made the team tougher. An AFP report quoted him as saying, “We have learnt from our defeats against Australia as we were in an awkward position at Faisalabad and we fought our way out of it. We had a good series against Australia and they beat us. I think we played very good cricket but they are a good enough team to fight out of awkward positions and win the match. I am pleased that the boys have shown they are able to do that too.”I think we fought back well from the position of 9 for 3 and our batsmen, led by [Thilan] Samaraweera, fought well to give us a chance to set up the rest of the match,” he said. “Sanath Jayasuriya’s innings was absolutely fantastic and is the sort of innings you look for from your champion player.”Dyson was now hopeful that the winning momentum will be continued in the final Test at Karachi which starts on Thursday. Sri Lanka are now looking for a hat-trick of series wins in Pakistan after victories on their previous tours in 1995 and 1999.A series win in Pakistan would be memorable, but Dyson was anxious for the team to prove itself outside the subcontinent. “We have identified that winning outside Sri Lanka is necessary to raise the profile of Sri Lankan cricket and we must also play well in England, Australia and South Africa.”

Reform Group set to meet with ECB

The Cricket Reform Group, the collection of former players and enthusiasts who announced at the end of the summer their belief that English cricket needed revolution rather than reform, is set to meet with the England & Wales Cricket Board next week to discuss its proposals for the future of the game.The CRG are headed by Michael Atherton, and include another former England captain, Bob Willis, as well as the journalist Michael Parkinson, businessman Nigel Wray, and Willis’s brother David.The CRG’s proposals are nothing if not radical, calling for a dramatic reduction in the number of counties (and with it professionals) as the most visible measure of a plan which aims to revamp the game at every level. The original manifesto had the feel of being the result of a long lunch during the Oval Test – it was presented on a single sheet of A4 paper. By the time of next week’s meeting the CRG will have prepared a far more detailed document.”Our manifesto for change is now in its final stages,” David Willis told the Independent on Sunday. “Michael Atherton has undertaken discussions with a whole range of people in the game, and a number of very important people as well as players.”Not too much is known about the detail of the CRG’s plan, but it will include a reduction in the amount of first-class cricket, an end to Minor Counties cricket, and more emphasis on the top tiers of club cricket.John Carr, the ECB’s deputy chief executive and one of those who will attend the meeting, was keen to underline that while new proposals were always welcome, there was much to be commended with the game as it is. “Of course we will be taking them [the CRG] seriously. We have to achieve a balance between being prepared to be honest and review our procedures, and reinforcing the fact that there is a lot that is good about the game at the moment. If there has been some concern about what the CRG have said, it is that.”The CRG’s founders don’t see the meeting with the ECB as the end of their attempts at radical reform, rather the beginning. Whatever the outcome, they will continue their fight for change, and if the ECB are not wholly enthusiastic then the CRG hope that they can win support by going directly to the public. This one will run and run.

Langer fights to crack swinging dilemma

Andrew Flintoff finds a way through Justin Langer at Edgbaston © Getty Images

Justin Langer admits Australia’s batsmen haven’t cracked the troubling reverse-swing puzzle, but Ricky Ponting has confirmed the side has developed strategies to nullify its damaging effects. England’s pace bowlers have mastered the movement of the older ball and have embarrassed Michael Clarke and Simon Katich into leaving deliveries hitting their stumps, and confused the rest.Langer said the movement caused the batsmen to change from instinctive play to using a shorter back-lift as they coped with the restricted scoring options. “We definitely haven’t cracked it,” Langer said in the . “There is a lot of discussion going on. This is like a new little puzzle we have to solve. When we do crack it, it will be a very satisfying feeling. I think we are getting close.”Writing in his column in , Ponting said his players were working hard in the nets to improve. “We’ve already come up with some strategies to make sure we practise against it as much as we can,” he wrote. “If you look at when most of the wickets have fallen, it’s been between overs ten and 30 which is just after the lacquer comes of the ball and it starts reversing.”Ponting said it was important to survive the early stages because after that “it’s not so bad”. “The hardest thing about facing reverse-swing bowling is the pace it’s delivered at because then it tends to swing a lot later,” he said. “When it’s swinging late at 145kph it’s pretty difficult to play and we’ve only got one guy – Brett Lee – who can do that. We have to make sure we’re bowling him at the right times.”

It's official – it was a Super Farce

As the dust settles on the Super Series, the world’s media have had a chance to assess what has gone on. And by and large, their assessment won’t go down too well in the hallowed halls of the ICC HQ in Dubai. After all, even the tournament’s official website wrote that the Super Test became a “Super Farce” – but this was the same site that steadfastly referred to Muttiah Muralidaran and Nathan Wade (Nathan Bracken to his close family) throughout.In the Daily Telegraph, Simon Briggs wasted no time in slamming what he saw as little more than a money-making exercise. “The original theory was that the Super Series could run alongside the World Cup (quadrennial) and Champions Trophy (biennial), so filling in the one year in every cycle that does not feature an ICC cash cow. But as the scale of the World XI’s latest defeat sank in, ICC chief executive Malcolm Speed did everything he could to distance himself from this pledge. “There is no commitment to play every four years,” he said last night. As the ICC are reluctant to let a single year go past without a money-making opportunity, the latest theory is that the Super Series will be replaced by a ‘Grand Final’, in which the top two teams in the Test and one-day rankings play off in a pair of winner-takes-all contests.”Gideon Haigh in the Guardian continued the theme. “The ICC’s decision making looks as though it might bear some scrutiny, too. Speed reminded everyone yesterday that the Super Series had been “profitable” for member nations, and that he was “very happy with the things under our control”, even though he “shared the disappointment” of the World XI players. Disappointment, however, will not do: Super Series Returns will need to leap a big credibility gap in a single bound.”Some solace came from Peter Roebuck in the Independent. “No harm has been done, though,” he wrote. “No one can be blamed for trying something. Much the same applies to the referring of appeals. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.”But Roebuck’s views were not shared by too many others in Australia. In the Sydney Morning Herald, Will Swanton was less than welcoming. “Waiting for another Super Series? Don’t hold your breath. Speed has done a backflip over the concept in the aftermath to the hopelessly lopsided contests between a resurgent Australian team and the badly misfiring Rest of the World. In all likelihood, this is the end of the World XI as we know it.” He concluded: “It might not have been do or die for the players, but it was for the concept. No need to go to the video umpire. It’s out.”Waleed Aly, writing in Melbourne’s Age admitted that he was a supporter of the concept … until now. “The cliche runs that in sport it is best to play like there is no tomorrow. Unfortunately, that is exactly what the World XI did.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus